Subject: RE: FW: TAKENAKA
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1999 03:25:35 -0500
From: "Imafuku, Nobuhiro" <Nobuhiro.Imafuku@mts.com>
To: "Rood, Omar" <Omar.Rood@mts.com>, "Larson, Rod" <Rod.Larson@mts.com>
CC: "Katabami, Yoshihiro" <Yoshihiro.Katabami@mts.com>

Hello, OMAR & ROD san.

I understand we have no problem if TAKENAKA choose strain gage type,
servo type or semiconductor type accelerometer. But, if TAKENAKA choose
piezoelectric type accelerometer, do you request TAKENAKA to pay extra
money for this ?

REGARDS     FUKU

        -----Original Message-----
        From:   Rood, Omar
        Sent:   Saturday, July 31, 1999 1:38 AM
        To:     Imafuku, Nobuhiro
        Subject:        FW: FW: TAKENAKA

        Fuku,
        see below about accelerometer types!
        Omar

        -----Original Message-----
        From:   Rod Larson [SMTP:rod.larson@mts.com]
        Sent:   Friday, July 30, 1999 11:27 AM
        To:     Rood, Omar
        Subject:        Re: FW: TAKENAKA

        Omar,
        497.22B DC Conditioner only works for servo,strain gauge, or
semiconductor
        accelerometer.  Piezo-electric requires a special current
amplifier
        conditioner.  We can do this, but it would require a special
stand-alone
        conditioner that we could mount somewhere.
        Rod

        At 08:23 AM 7/29/99 -0500, you wrote:
        >Rod,
        >Best response to question #3.
        >Omar
        >
        >> -----Original Message-----
        >> From:        Imafuku, Nobuhiro
        >> Sent:        Wednesday, July 28, 1999 8:57 PM
        >> To:  Rood, Omar
        >> Subject:     RE: TAKENAKA
        >>
        >> Hello, OMAR san.
        >>
        >> 1.   Attached drawing is final location for seismic
configuration. I
        >> think total 15 m hose length is enough on this location but I
still
        >> need total 25 - 30 m hose for structure configuration.
        >> 2.   We will have a meeting with TAKENAKA week of August 16th
and
        >> TAKENAKA requests us to submit actuator drawing at this time.
Is it
        >> possible ? You already told me actuator drawing could be done
at the
        >> middle of August.
        >> 3.   TAKENAKA is still thinking accelerometer type (strain
gage,
        >> semiconductor or piezoelectric). I think we will supply all
        >> conditioners for all transducers. What king of conditioner
will you
        >> supply for accelerometer ? Do you have any accelerometer type
        >> limitation to use our conditioner ?
        >>
        >> REGARDS     FUKU
        >>
        >>  <<...>>
        >>
        >>      -----Original Message-----
        >>      From:   Rood, Omar
        >>      Sent:   Wednesday, July 28, 1999 11:40 PM
        >>      To:     Imafuku, Nobuhiro
        >>      Subject:        RE: TAKENAKA
        >>
        >>      Hello Fuku,
        >>      1.  Purple color, should be cute!!
        >>      2.  The pressure fluctuations are least at the hardline
        >> interconnection point, so that is the place of least worry
for the
        >> fittings.  Please note, I did not write that the 37 degree
fitting
        >> would not meet the proof pressure, i.e. 1.5 times the working
        >> pressure. I wrote that the design of the fitting did not meet
the MTS
        >> desired standard of 4 times the working pressure for the
design
        >> strength.
        >>      Regards
        >>      Omar
        >>
        >>              -----Original Message-----
        >>              From:   Imafuku, Nobuhiro
        >>              Sent:   Tuesday, July 27, 1999 11:36 PM
        >>              To:     Rood, Omar
        >>              Subject:        TAKENAKA
        >>
        >>              Hello, OMAR san.
        >>
        >>              1.      I went to TAKENAKA yesterday to see
table and
        >> actuator location. I have a chance to see TAKENAKA table and
TAKENAKA
        >> is installing this table now. TAKENAKA table is purple plus
(with)
        >> blue color. By the way, do you need brief table drawing ?
        >>              2.      Your comment is hard to understand me.
You said
        >> "you use 37 degree flare fitting for MHI port block side" but
you said
        >> "37 degree flare fitting do not meet proof pressure". So, why
do you
        >> propose to use 37 degree flare fitting only for MHI port
block side.
        >> If we can use this fitting one place, I think we can use any
place.
        >>
        >>              REGARDS     FUKU
        >
